Rampage":19kxauxq said:Looks like the seatstays have come unattached and he's welded them back in the wrong place too.
i only scrolled up to have a look didn't i....
Rampage":19kxauxq said:Looks like the seatstays have come unattached and he's welded them back in the wrong place too.
Dossa":393gkl6p said:Is it a Zaskar?
Damn straight. Get the owner to put it into BOTM prontobren":35r844vg said:That is a supremely shit execution, but cce is spot on. It's clearly getting used and that in my opinion is worth more than ten catalogue restos that spend all year hidden away in sheds.
Reluctant":18t928nr said:That's ok in my book. It's a low end bike which was built as a workhorse and being used as one ~ fair play! I even approve of the Sainsburys bag seat cover too; beats getting a soggy arse!
When I think that somebody went to such lengths so that they could give their child a rider's-eye-view while cycling, it makes me think it's one of the coolest bike adaptations I've ever seen. That's one lucky child who gets to ride in the front seat and hang on to the handlebars while his dad transports him! It's probably also the most protective stance a dad could take for his child while cycling, which makes me wonder why I've never seen anything like that before. I like it, and it gets my vote for father of the year.MADJEZ":oe62o69x said:Spotted this (had a closer look having lost a blue GT, but not mine).
Couldn't believe that vandalism (or sh*t welding !).
Hope it was only an Outpost, difficult to tell under all that crap.
[/img]
Wytze":2h442x3a said: