Lightest steel retro frame set

SStumpjump":2m3qrbw0 said:
messiah":2m3qrbw0 said:
Where Breezer Lightning frames not sub 4lbs?

I think so... :p

supposedly , the 96 catalog gives 3.9
or 1.79 kg for a 18.5

I am a silly idiot :cry: as I did not weigh mine when I built it up to check if that was one more marketing exaggeration :roll:

all I know is that full bike weight for my build is about 10.5 kg so above the 9.9 of the catalog ( nearly identical save the rims and tyres and it does not make for the difference )

Most of the catalog weights are quite optimistic ;)
 
bduc61 said:
Most of the catalog weights are quite optimistic ;)

They sure are. Even today many manufacturers are VERY optimistic.

That Breezer is pretty light for a 18,5" frame! :shock:
 
All I know is that weight means nothing when you put a 14.5 stone clydesdale like me on one :LOL:

That said, my C-16 seems very light to me. About as light as I can handle.
 
cornholio's RC200":ubq8wc02 said:
All I know is that weight means nothing when you put a 14.5 stone clydesdale like me on one :LOL:

That said, my C-16 seems very light to me. About as light as I can handle.

I am only 10 stones and a few pounds but same comment ;)

and much easier and cheaper to loose weight on the big chunk that the small one.

never understood the weightweenies ;)
 
My '96 Generation was 4.5lbs. with a seat clamp and headset cups. 'Sensible light' for a steel frame IMO.

3468530165_f91a2f9d80.jpg
 
For comparison (and a laugh :LOL: ), taken from the weight weenie listings :

WD Pro":2xohbrgl said:
1990 ish (non afterburner rear stays) Marin. Tange double butted. Oversize down tube. 17.5” (center to center) frame size. Zolatone paint. No forks but with DX steel headset cups. 2.5Kg / 5.51Lb

Not the lightest thing around then ... :LOL:

WD :D
 
Back
Top