What can kill the looks of a bike for you?

WD Pro":18n3ud6y said:
The only thing that really niggles me is stuff that gets built for 'pictures' and then stripped and sold on ? :?

Does that really happen? I like shiny things as much as the next man, but I also don't like selling my shiny things!

perry":18n3ud6y said:
oh and obsessive gram counting by armchair dwellers who themselves weigh more than 13 stone . comeon carbon brakelevers and ti bottlecage bolts are the least of your worries

suppose this is the same as the above, done for doings sake. I can see how this could get competitive even if it made no difference to the ride.

Me, I'm with the big headtube haters, I know some people need big frames but anything over about 18" looks odd to me I'm afraid
 
Putting a rack on the back of a Trimble :shock: :oops: :cry: :cry: But its better than using a ruck sack all the time :LOL:
 
perry":lt3wadfy said:
"Too much branding generally.
I'm sorry, but I don't see why I should ride a bike that's basically a free advert for the manufacturer, even if it is cool"

yep

" fat men in lycra "

yep . no point stressing that your stem matches your socks if your a fatty fat fat fat

:LOL: :roll:

"xc" riders who insist on buying alllllll the kit :roll: clips , clear glasses , lycra skinsuit , bag , camelback , gloves , all that jazz . no bike looks good under that mess

alloy frames that arnt suspension

also agree with the touchers who buy all the bling parts . post pics . sell on . just learn to use photoshop for fook sake :roll:

oh and obsessive gram counting by armchair dwellers who themselves weigh more than 13 stone . comeon carbon brakelevers and ti bottlecage bolts are the least of your worries

the best looking bikes are the ones getting used

Agree on the armchair dwellers/oversized riders...always loads of them in MTB in the past and plenty of them still around now
 
Back
Top