caemis":36n9k1e7 said:
mkone":36n9k1e7 said:
... I think this is something we need to address now and make it official and recognised universaly.
What do you mean by this?
My thoughts are to make it a recognised standard. Say for example, any bike over 20yrs old achieves retro status.
Using guitars as an example again, throughout the industry guitars over a certain age are regarded and referred too as vintage. There are sites and other resources you can go too which support this along with the industry itself.
Now, if we spread the word through media and companies that a certain age is recognised as retro then maybe the retro ideal could be set permantly into cycling. Im sure there are people on here who have contacts in the various cycling circles to suggest this.
What then? well, anyone who needs info on their now retrobike will most likely find their way to Retrobike, the oldest and most comprehensive resource on the subject. And im sure it will lead to other sites popping up in the future too.
I feel this is something that the people on this forum who obviously have a real passion for this, should act upon and set the foundations for the future.
And personally i think that FB and other sites are a positive. Granted, and going by what others say, they may not be as informed, but for them to be there shows interest in the subject and while some say this site is suffering as a result, i personaly doubt that member on here would give up this wealth of retroness for some new takes on the subject.
Make people aware of the subject itself and they will come to this site eventually, as its the foremost site on the subject.