hookooekoo
Senior Retro Guru
I rode mountain bikes a lot in the 1990s, and then for a long time I only cycled on road. Having not ridden off road for a long time, the emergence of full suspension bikes always puzzled me. I always thought ' Surely everyone already cycled all of these trails on fully rigid bikes, why do they need full suspension'. Last night I watched a bodycam video on YouTube of someone riding on the Helvellyn Sticks Pass trail, and for the first time I started to understand why some people think full suspension is where it's at.
There's no need to slow down, pick a line, or allow for the fact that your tyres might not be spending much time in contact with the ground. You just go full speed ahead, and come crashing straight through, sometimes not even following the trail at all, while leaving a small cloud of dust behind. It's the style of riding that on a fully rigid bike, the average rider probably couldn't sustain for more than a few seconds at a time.
Am I right? Or is it a minority of full suspension riders who ride like this?
There's no need to slow down, pick a line, or allow for the fact that your tyres might not be spending much time in contact with the ground. You just go full speed ahead, and come crashing straight through, sometimes not even following the trail at all, while leaving a small cloud of dust behind. It's the style of riding that on a fully rigid bike, the average rider probably couldn't sustain for more than a few seconds at a time.
Am I right? Or is it a minority of full suspension riders who ride like this?