Re: Re:
shinobi":d4phywgv said:
...going back to Abaca s original post one of my kids bought me an MBUK a couple of weeks back and i was stunned at the prices of some of the kit in there . :shock:
I buy MBUK too whenever I'm back in the UK for a holiday, and I've been gobsmacked at how expensive things are now. I also notice a few mags, including MBUK, subtly deriding retrobikes these days, along the lines of 'look at the ridiculous stems / frames / brakes / gear shifters people used back in the 90s!!' OK, so the magazines need to sell the latest products and promote the desire to constantly upgrade and buy the latest technology, otherwise they're out of a job, so I can't really blame them.
In a recent What (or Which?) Mountain Bike, there was a nice article on frame materials, which gave a good account of current cutting edge technologies and materials, but which downplayed steel (essentially, saying steel peaked with 853 and has had its day). As someone who cares about the planet, and our children's future, I am concerned that the mountain biking scene has become so consumerist that bikes are now considered so disposable - you buy a new bike every year, or every two years, and alu frames by their very nature aren't built for longevity, they will eventually crack, people know this and will bin an alu frame way before it shows signs of fatigue. The same goes for titanium, despite still being thought of as indestructible by many, and one just has to look at the scarcity of used ti frames here without cracks to see they are not truly made to last. Based on all this, I see things eventually going full circle as cyclists wake up to the environmental impact of their cycling products and steel eventually becomes trendy again.
This has gone way off topic, sorry, but my conclusion is that by choosing to be retrobikers we are not only saving money and reliving past glory days, but we are also reducing our environmental impact and carbon footprint