ishaw":3l7e13x4 said:or I could go totally crazy and finally fit the lawwill leaders I have to something??
63mm xc forks didn't come in until 1996. In 1994, most builders designed for 40-50mm travel if they made their frames suspension-adjusted at all (and I don't believe that it's true that most did - more like a half I should have thought).suburbanreuben":1lt8cv2q said:He did make the frames to fit the fork, as just about everyone did in 1994. It was "suspension corrected" for 63mm travel or 415mm rigid forks. 80mm won't faze it; it'l just be a little more stable at warp factor 5.
YUp, but in those days suggested sag was 10%, if that.Anthony":2px4g9ul said:63mm xc forks didn't come in until 1996. In 1994, most builders designed for 40-50mm travel if they made their frames suspension-adjusted at all (and I don't believe that it's true that most did - more like a half I should have thought).suburbanreuben":2px4g9ul said:He did make the frames to fit the fork, as just about everyone did in 1994. It was "suspension corrected" for 63mm travel or 415mm rigid forks. 80mm won't faze it; it'l just be a little more stable at warp factor 5.
utahdog2003":3499232p said:Chris DeKerf cut the seatstays too short on the prototype, and had to bridge the gap with a horizontal tube. Somebody said, "hey, that looks cool"...probably a girl, and the rest is history...
...OK, that's pretty much all made up.
suburbanreuben":2lpoyk13 said:The 415/63mm recommendation is from the horses mouth...