marin man":3d5i7ebk said:Also,argumentative child,......
Lets keep the personal insults out of this site, and leave this thread at least vaguely on topic
marin man":3d5i7ebk said:Also,argumentative child,......
gump":3ubrrz39 said:marin man":3ubrrz39 said:Also,argumentative child,......
Lets keep the personal insults out of this site, and leave this thread at least vaguely on topic
gump":2elhdayx said:marin man":2elhdayx said:Also,argumentative child,......
Lets keep the personal insults out of this site, and leave this thread at least vaguely on topic
marin man":3q2ep08l said:The first link in johns post shows the original litigation company advert Notice how the image has been removed
The second post shows a wheel in pieces on a road bike not an mtb and be sure to read the comments and not just look at the pictures
The third post has no circumstances describing what happened so how are we to know that it was not ran over by a car :?: :?:
Really grabs coat and all belongings and emigrates
(anyone can upload damaging photos on the internet )
John":1erlosos said:You make a persuasive case. Spinergys rule and I'm going order a few sets, one for each of my bikes.
Of course the truth probably lies somewhere betwen your view and that on the website linked. Do you accept any of the failed spinergys were mtb sets or not? To turn the tables do you have any proof there have been no mtb spinergy failures outside crashes and accidents?
Also do you have any proof your spinergys have been ridden?
Thanks for the PM too by the way, if you want to discuss this we can do so here