Not a chance of winning but a rare Columbus Max tubed/ lugged Arthur Caygill from around 1994 with thoroughly modern equipment
I entered it as it was a technical tour de force in 1990's steel frame construction. The Columbus lugs were rarely used and rarely seen with the butting taking steel tubing to the er, max.
I could also describe the 1950's Hill Special as the same. It was very advanced for its day and equally expensive to build and with a light weight (but scary!!) 60 year old wheelset it is as exciting to ride and could be potentially the same weight build too given the right period components.
753 was technically the best that the 1970's could offer but was a complete arse to build with hence you needed a certificate from Reynolds before you could set about the material with vigour.
When someone
with that builders certificate is impressed with said MAX frame due to its construction and weight then I am too a wee bit excited, possibly jumping up and down like the giant manchild that I am.
Having owned and more importantly ridden some 400+ frames of various qualities including many Oria, Columbus, Tange, Vitus etc etc - a lot of 853 but sadly only 1 single 753 (Peugeot Perthus) , this Columbus frame has been the best for me so far.
It doesnt matter what brand or number is on the frame, if it wasnt constructed with care or skill it doesnt matter how much glitter it gets rolled in.
And most importantly, I entered the Caygill because it is a bit of fun and hopelessly tasteless.
*just to add a bit more, my second favourite ridin' iron is made from Japanese Tange Champion No.5 tubing, plain gauge seemless but the ride, whilst completely different to the Caygill, is just perfect for my Greek God body that rides it.