Thias
Klein Fan
See? That's the interesting part. The Scott has its rear swing arm turn around the bottom bracket. Literally. It makes for a funny (and quite brittle) bearing. But it also ensures that the chain tension doesn't influence the suspension. The distance between the rear axle and the bottom bracket is staying constant while the suspension is travelling. As opposed to the Proflex. There the swing arm bearing is (way) above the bb. So whenever the suspension compresses, the rear axle swings away from the bb. Or, if you think about it the other way around: If you press on the pedal, the chain tries to pull the rear wheel closer to the bb. That in turn is what people call pedal bobbing. Which doesn't occur with the Scott, because of the mechanics explained above.I'd imagine they ride quite similarly given the rear setups - both likely to suffer under pedal load.
Here is a picture of that scott bottom backet/swingarm bearing.
Mine was broken and I had do do some welding to fix it. (I made a build thread for that bike, too. There should be a link in my sig.)
Those kind of experiments that were actually done and produced and sold in the early to mid 90ties. I find that to be most interesting. I can't stop myself from babbling about it...
Long story short: Scott: No peddal bobbing. Proflex: I suspect quite some of it. Not too much, because of the small amount of travel, but still.
@MSYT That is a fantastic drawing.
Beeing a computer guy irl I try to keep my hobby analog, mostly. So no CNC for me
Also I'm one step further already.
Aaand done!
Last edited: