Stems are cheap, someone may even have a bundle. Then when you decide, what feels nice with the frame and forks and position, look for the Syncros.
I think I could of phrased my question better. I know about effective top tube, so I guess what I want to know if how much shorter this is than the actual top tube.
It's longer, actual top tube is about half inch shorter iirc (but that could be a normal RM, not the Kona, could check but it's cold and the ), but it doesn't matter as that's not what you should be comparing to on the Fisher..
That fisher is about 1.5" shorter from what you say, than the Kona, but it depends how and from what point Fisher measured. (I don't know Fishers that well)
Some measure actuals from CTC along the horizontal, some measured from the edge of the weld/joint along the top etc.
A quick look at the 1990 Fisher catalogue and they measure effective top tube C2C as did Kona.
So they are the same measurement.
Just get a 120mm and go from there, it's a nice short length for the late 90s and incredibly short for the early 90s.
A quick look and Kona fitted a 120mm/6deg stem, which may be similar to Syncros 120mm Zero stems (they often sit higher than the simpler stems) and way a few spacers can raise it that 6deg or so.