In what way does that blog post suggest that it is a bad idea to invert the bars?
As far as I'm concerned, regarding fashion, that has always been a thing. People have sacrificed comfort in the pursuit of a certain look, be it ultra aggressive slammed positions, or people converting their bikes to singlespeed because they want that clean look. Fashion even dictates component choices in most cases, the return to classic componentry on modern bikes is as much a fashion statement as it is an appreciation for older tech.
I am a fan of everything alternative within bicycling, yes. Because there's creativity and experimentation which is ultimately a positive thing. People are repurposing older bikes, and yes often they're dictated by trends. For example you see a bunch of people fitting exceptionally large tyres in old MTB frames because it looks utterly brutal, but why is it a bad thing if they enjoy tinkering with the bikes and use them? I of course think practicality is important, and making decisions to set up a bike a certain way and then it being uncomfortable to ride is of course silly. But as someone who frequents the circles of xbike enthusiasts, who are proud of this sort of bastardery, I can tell you that they definitely do ride their bikes - and they ride more than the majority of leather saddle patina sniffers who wouldn't even dare take their bike outside on a damp day.
The guy with that Surly uses it daily, and goes on great adventures. No complaints about comfort. Also, since when were bars at saddle height a bad thing? That's always been my go to for comfort. But I suppose I best assess historical documents to determine what feels right for me
?
Also Rob voiced some concerns in regards to how the bars set up inverted could apply some undue pressure on the hands, I believe that was it. I made it clear to him that should it be uncomfortable I'd probably turn them 'the right way up', the jury is still out as I'm missing some parts to take the CC on long trips.
Love you Woz
