Thanks to 'My teenage self' for the reply and info. As a more 'current bike' ignoramous (I used to be so keen back in the late 50's and 60's with a Claud Butler and a Cenelli! Yeah, yeah, that dates me!, but still active in my late 70's) I am quite keen to know what particular parts on my Saracen purchase that makes it 'low end' please? Is it the quality of frame (60/61 Alloy), the front forks (still sprung front shocks rather than plain) or maybe the choice of gear change, etc? So much else appears to be fairly standard.
I take your point that manufacturers produce a 'range' of quality, but what items really make a quality/price difference when it comes to the Saracen bikes of this era for sale?
I looked through various Catalogues on the website to see if I could identify in by Year, but although I could see some fairly close around late 1990's and early 2000's, and even found some Traverse's, I could'nt actually find this model - Might it be a mix and match, or do you reckon it's mostly original? Any thoughts on the above welcome and appreciated.
ps@: As regards the 'masochists saddle' - the one on it was missing so was just testing what diameter of saddle tube I will be needing. Seems to be bigger diameter then any I've seen so far.
Over to you (or anyone else who might chip in!) please? Cheers, Richard