Re:
OK thanks, though i doubt internal / external widths are the only technical difference between HG and IG as both were available simultaneously back in the '90s. If it were only about widths and HG is comparable with IG in that respect, why make IG at all and clearly specify compatibility on the chainset?
Granted, any difference would appear to be minor, apon examining both types i do notice the edges of the IG outer link plates are shamfered slightly differently whereby the IG edge is thinner than the HG (on the two chains i am holding and examining at least), perhaps to engage more easily or fit better the lifting tabs on the IG chainrings. That's why i'm wondering if using HG chain on IG chainset may affect shift quality.
I don't really doubt that a HG chain would work but i find it enjoyable to understand technical details fully. Manufacturers usually do things for a reason even if us consumers are not fully appraised of what or why. I have noticed over the years that in many different engineering applications, maintaining specs as originally designed often works better than making changes and trying to second guess the designers.
As for the apparent deletion of IG chains, that could simply be a case of Shimano having eventually abandoned the format in their spares suppy 'chain'.
Has anyone ridden HG chain on their formerly IG equipped bike and can comment on relative shift quality?
Thanks and seasons greetings