pigman":3st5a2lz said:hey lads, I didn't say triples were no good.
They certainly have their place, and I can see me having one in 10 years
But for me they still look crap.... not really in a lack of cred sense, just aesthetically, they spoil the lines of a bike. Even a tourer or MTB looks better with a double.
You won't sway my opinion .... but then it is just that - an opinion
non-fixie":3tkxc7tt said:Right there with you, pigman. I'd rather walk up a hill than mount a triple on a racing bike. Having said that, I don't have Fausto's legs, so I do modify my gearing to the maximum a short cage derailleur will handle (I won't put an MTB derailer on a racing bike either).
daugs":17vugfod said:says the person living in the Netherlands where practically a quarter of the country is below sea level and the highest point is 322m ! That's only 12m higher than the tallest building in London, the Shard.
When living in Cambridge (similarly flat) I just rode a 70" fixed, a long time before it was popular, but still aesthetically pleasing. My Pine Mountain has a short (possibly medium ?) cage and a triple with no trouble.