Canti , V's or Disc brakes which is best??

So looks like v's are in the middle in both of the power and weight.
 
I think it's a really sweeping generalisation to say that discs are lightest - I think the arrows are the wrong way round....?

Generally cantis and V's are about the same, with discs generally heavier - extra on the hubs, wheels need longer spokes, rotors, hydraulic cables etc.
 
i'm going in terms of "best-ness" on that factor. so cantis are better than v's which are better than discs for weight....
 
I know what i prefer :cool:

But i'll say-'each to their own' ;)


If you want to stay alive on the trail ,then discs it is
but if you want to build a nice original specced MTB from the 80-90's, then canti's or v's would be right and proper

I think this is important on a site dedicated to older bikes ;) :LOL:
 
Vs as good as discs power wise....in the dry

Any mud/wet involved then discs best cantis & Vs hands down
 
FairfaxPat":1fxm9o0u said:
Disc's are absolutely better than Any rim brake, both in the dry and the wet.

Yes, no question about it :cool: Better in every way - power, modulation, reliability, ease of set-up, and I don't think that something like Marta SL's give much away weight wise either.
 
So alot a people like disc then. So rim brakes are no good anymore?
 
rojo":1pdsf0xx said:
So alot a people like disc then. So rim brakes are no good anymore?

Nothing wrong with rim brakes in the dry at all....more than adequate unless your riding in the alps
 
Back
Top