Best production Hardtail of the 1990's?

Re: Re:

Smithjss70":3ffkkz6p said:
but I have to go with the ARC. In all fairness, it's a 97 with modern 07 full XTR, fork and disc brakes so it probably doesn't qualify; but hey, it is a 90's hardtail so...

In all fairness, it's a 99, but that may just be splitting hairs. Can't argue against an ARC being a great production hardtail.
 
sorry i agree with "hamster" 94 zaskar could xc, could downhill, (most courses were weak back then) just everybike for everyone... :D
 
Re: Re:

sinnerman":3hv55gv3 said:
Production steel, still built by hand, quality tubeset. real reliability, totally fixable. and Cult status too.

There can be only one.

Bontrager.

http://www.retrobike.co.uk/gallery2/d/2 ... inder2.pdf

and some good reasons in depth in this thread proves the point

viewtopic.php?t=122110

And the same can be said for Road Bikes too..... :cool:

And if you'd like to find out for yourself, I happen to have a rather lovely example for sale here: http://www.retrobike.co.uk/forum/viewto ... p;t=296698

dum-de-dum.....
 
Re:

Has to be the Orange Clockwork, nothing else comes close, longest production run, best riding and thrashed most of the competition on the UK circuit when they came out, also out sold pretty much everything else.
(For good reason) They were ridden all over the planet on expeditions and will out handle anything from over the pond by a mile.
 
Re:

Blimey, what a question.

I guess you need to be a little more specific maybe?

For me it's got to be a Bontrager as my first thought, although the ones I've ridden are pre-'92 so it depends how you define 'production'...

As noted by CCMdoc, the Rascal is a great ride. Always my bike of choice, and I still really lust for the '93 in 'whatever' fade it was from the MTBPro review of the same year...

Love/loathe/snob they do handle well and I love mine rigid or FS - it makes me [feelingly] a better rider than I am, and is always very predictable. As Elev12K can vouch from Wales a few years ago - I predicted I was gonna go arse over, did, and almost caught the bike mid-air... :]

There's a big UK bias toward Kona, and I still get jitters [in a good way] thinking of '93 Explosifs and Kilaueas - but that's purely based on looks and perceived 'yes' ness and I've never actually ridden a Kona....

I'm gonna stick with Bontrager though. What you see is what you get, I respect the thinking behind them, the thinking isn't masked, and they're beautiful to ride.

The steel S-Works are nice too mind...

Quality of production as judgement for 'best'? Gotta be Miyata. I have seen many, and they are all exquisite - be they NOS / abused / loved / shoved - all structurally tight and perfect, apart from the 'ex-HB' one offered a couple of years ago which was shagged and had a separated top tube / seat tube lug. But, if it was genuine, it didn't have an easy life as a 'production' hard tail - especially a hard tail modded to 'soft tail' duty...

From all this crap I've written, there is one forum member who has owned / ridden / sold more production / other bikes than anyone I know either side of the pond, and his posting is surely needed here.

So, Jez-4-bikes-max where are you?!

P.S. Im STILL looking for a '93 RaceLite - and Dan from Germany can politely leave the next one for me...

Cheers,
BB.
 
Limited production & stratosphere pricing doesnt really make a bike count as that limits availability at time of release and later on.

Back in the real world, taking into account pricing and availability, a Zaskar is quite hard to beat. Clockworks didnt suit everybody and any Kona was light years ahead in design.

The Zaskar was there with 1 1/8 ahead in the 1992/93 model years whilst the Clockwork was stuck with 1". Zaskars could even take to suspension forks without too much issue.

And a Zaskar was built in the USA - what more could you want if your national flag is the Stars & Stripes.
 
Back
Top