cce":2sfuont5 said:
if you have a herd, what best represents you when you got here, and you now?
I guess I'm in a rather different position Keir. It's not me that's come a long way, but the bike. I don't think Retrobike has had any influence on the way I build bikes though.
I have no photo of it when I bought it, but the catalogue picture below shows pretty much what my 97 Kilauea looked like when I bought it in 1998. Since then it has been through many iterations, the most recent being shown below that in a picture taken a couple of days ago. It has had several competitors for my attentions each day. More expensive steel ones, a full-suspension scandium one, a titanium one, an aluminium one, all excellent and all different, but I still seem to choose it a lot of the time. It's light (slightly lighter than your 96 for some reason that I don't understand), nimble, lively, fun, comfortable. I don't think it's a question of whether my best bikes are better than one another, but more whether I like them better, and I like this bike as much as any of them. I guess I was just lucky to hit on a good bike right from the word go. It was my first proper bike and cost me £500 one year old, having been £999 new. The avid levers are the only original part. I still have the P2, but I'm very unlikely to ever fit it again, although I probably wouldn't sell it.