Who Will You Vote For In The Coming General Election?

[CTK]

No trolling at all. I was pointing out that when you say this is not acceptable then pointing it out is just that, if you then go onto do it yourself as harry had, then that is hypocrisy

Let me help, "Corbyn has aligned himself with terrorists for years" this is a truthfull statement but if you are not happy with it then saying so is pointing it out as you have worded it

To write
Harryburgundy wrote:
Here we go again...the old 'terrorist sympathising' bollocks. I really can't be arsed with this level of debate

and then follow it up quite soon after with

Harryburgundy wrote:
A hung parliament is a hung parliament...the Tories didn't win, if they did they wouldn't need to get into bed with loyalist terrorists.

Would be and is, hypocrisy

So the Tories are hypocrites then? you agree?

 

[KDM]

On the fact you were, still are, more likely to see Corbyn with a terrorist group of some kind than a British Military supporting the troops event, then no as that would be an accurate statement.

On some other matters then yes, they are a political party after all and that is what most in party politics do.

A perfect example would be Labour objecting to grammar schools despite it's leader and his son both having gone to them and some of Corbyns own top table such as Chakrabati also doing the same with her son as did Diane Abbot, those would be a good example of hypociscy

 

[ajm]

Re: Re:

Are you trolling KDM? Cant believe you are saying this seriously. The Tories and the RW media were the ones criticising Corbyn for meeting terrorists and being a terrorist sympathiser! Its hypocrisy on their part to deal with the DUP. Pointing to hypocrisy is not hypocrisy.

Do you have any evidence whatsoever that the DUP have encouraged, supported or condoned terrorism or murder of any kind at any point? It was after all founded by a Protestant minister who endangered his own life in loudly condemning murders committed by loyalists as well as the many more which were committed by republicans.

On the other hand, Jeremy Corbyn has been an active and public sympathiser with murderous groups all over the world - the idea of him becoming more prominent in British politics is frankly disgusting. The man has been rightly scorned for his appalling lack of decency on many occasions over the past year or so - are people's memories really so poor? Is this shifty-eyed, incoherent and incompetent communist really anyone's idea of a good leader? The country's in even more trouble than I had realised, if so.

 

[Bats]

Re: Re:

Is this shifty-eyed, incoherent and incompetent communist really anyone's idea of a good leader?

Hello. Nothing you said about Corbyn is true, especially about him being a communist. I know because I am one. The scary kind with the Stalin.

 

[highlandsflyer]

Scary? Like a little frost on the lawn. Ooh, eeh! Perhaps I will go back and put some slippers on!

 

[CTK]

Re: Re:

Do you have any evidence whatsoever that the DUP have encouraged, supported or condoned terrorism or murder of any kind at any point?

http://metro.co.uk/2017/06/09/tories-to ... p-6697769/

http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/polit ... d-10593921

Google came up with those

 

[highlandsflyer]

It really isn't important. If SF had come to the table as it were, Corbyn would have welcomed the help. Horses for courses. Tory victory, whatever anyone thinks.

Great hope for Labour going forward, but only if Corbyn can build on 'this' over the next three years, (which is how long I anticipate May will have, given they will want to dump her after Brexit's dirty deeds are done, leaving time to regroup under another anointed leader, which shall likely be Boris).

If he continues to let May ride him he is spent.

 

[xxnick1975]

Re:

I see the result as an anti Tory/may vote rather than a pro labour/Corbyn shift

 

[gibbleking]

I voted for the Venezuelan people's reactionary socialist revolutionary activists party of Norfolk, we lost.that is all.

 

[Harryburgundy]

It really isn't important. If SF had come to the table as it were, Corbyn would have welcomed the help. Horses for courses. Tory victory, whatever anyone thinks.

Great hope for Labour going forward, but only if Corbyn can build on 'this' over the next three years, (which is how long I anticipate May will have, given they will want to dump her after Brexit's dirty deeds are done, leaving time to regroup under another anointed leader, which shall likely be Boris).

If he continues to let May ride him he is spent.

Three years? Three months more like.

The DUP can not vote to pass May's manifesto (Evel Law 2015). The Tories are running a minority government in parliament, she's a lame duck. At the moment the Tories are regrouping to find their new leader before giving May the heaveho and a vote of no confidence. I see another election looming in the very short term...this government simply can not govern.

PS Corbyn would not have done a deal with SF