W Wildturkey Devout Dirtbag Feedback View Sep 1, 2016 #1 What Kona is this please? Forks xc 51? Thanks Chris
W Wildturkey Devout Dirtbag Feedback View Sep 1, 2016 #3 Re: The top tube did make me think GT Worth buying? Looks a huge frame??
6 66 triumph daytona Senior Retro Guru Feedback View Sep 1, 2016 #4 Re: They are not XC 51 forks,they are XC 700 forks which are way way better.If original to the bike it would date it circa 1996.
Re: They are not XC 51 forks,they are XC 700 forks which are way way better.If original to the bike it would date it circa 1996.
W Wildturkey Devout Dirtbag Feedback View Sep 1, 2016 #5 Re: Ok thanks triumph Any ideas on the frame?
mamadirt Kona Fan GT Fan Feedback View Sep 1, 2016 #6 Hmmmmm, I'd be more inclined to think Saracen judging by the top tube/seat tube junction :? Defo not a Kona though.
Hmmmmm, I'd be more inclined to think Saracen judging by the top tube/seat tube junction :? Defo not a Kona though.
Bullpup Senior Retro Guru Sep 1, 2016 #8 That top tube looks like it is ovoid - vertical at the head tube and horizontal at the seat tube
FluffyChicken Archivist Retrobike Rider Feedback View Sep 1, 2016 #9 Re: Saracen frame and style, even the bi localised style they used (style pinched form maxOS on their top end frame iirc)
Re: Saracen frame and style, even the bi localised style they used (style pinched form maxOS on their top end frame iirc)