FSXStumpy":2vbxa791 said:Beautiful! Never seen one of those before! Did you market them?
J
TIME WARP...BAM!I did a lot of prototype stuff back at the start of 90's then got in to MTB's and did these, a company called RAD Components marketed them for a short while, but the V brake killed the market off almost over night.
Wide cantis up front. Low profile at the seat stays. Mix and match.Lots of potential arguments pending but the Shimano wide canti of old doesnt care what hanger you use, it just stops you safely and quickly with all the modulation you could possible want.
Until it gets wet...
The other problem is that they stick out a bit and can catch your heels on the rear.
br-m62, 732, mt60 etc
The next argument is that 'v-brakes' didnt appear until around 1995 for the '96 season so you appear to have a time machine - we want it!
I just use the standard Shimano/ Dia-comp 'hook' style as they haven't really failed me yet.
There are these which are for low pro cantis
These lock the cable down but can make removing the wheel more difficult
Wide hangar changes geometry and is well suited to drop bar levers which suposedly pull more cable. I heard it and i am not 100% but it makes sense.I am sure I read somewhere that a wide hanger helps the 'angles' ?
I prefer the type you can clamp onto the cables - makes centralising stuff easier and longer lasting
WD
They pull pretty much the same as I recall. Wide hangers are nice to bring rear cantis in for better heel clearance. Just my 2 cents..Wide hangar changes geometry and is well suited to drop bar levers which suposedly pull more cable. I heard it and i am not 100% but it makes sense.
Wide on the rear? You mean wide on the front and narrow on the rear? For example, Critical Racing made two cantilever types: short/wide & tall/narrow. The premise was simply having two variations to appeal to buyers that had the similar braking force, but inadvertently riders found you got basically the same (or slightly better short/wide) mechanical advantage between the two types and a short/wide front & tall/narrow rear combination was desired. The rider could buy the brand they liked, had good braking force up front and good, maybe decent in the rear BUT the tall/narrow also allowed the heal of the foot to clear the brake arm during upstroke of the crank arms.They pull pretty much the same as I recall. Wide hangers are nice to bring rear cantis in for better heel clearance. Just my 2 cents..