maroon113":2jf6yldt said:RockiMtn":2jf6yldt said:i'd pick ti over alum any/every day if all else equal and you have the extra $$$. also from what i know, you need more alum material to match the same strength of titanium, hence the more "burly" drop-outs on the alum GT vs ti Kona. just my 2cents/pence.
Drop your tires 3 PSI and that is most of the difference between Aluminum and Ti. In comfort. Aluminum doesn't flex like Titanium and accelerates better, it feels better in hard turns because it doesn't flex. Zaskars are better sprinters than Xizangs. Not as comfortable sure. I'm not on a couch, this is a sport.
The Zaskar has more "burly" dropouts because it is a more Burly Bike than the other two. They are built like 1990 Mercedes Benz sedans. Solid. Who would win in a 3-way street fight between the three? My money is on the Zaskar.
So much ridicule on Aluminum frames, alot of it connected with (cough) bike-snobbery (cough) and such. Aluminum can make excellent frames. And most of the bike industry agreed. Hence, the mass popularity and production. Schwinn Homegrown, Yeti Arc, Specialized Stumpjumper, GT Zaskar, to name a few..
Personally they are different beasts. For longer, 3+ hour rides, the Hei Hei would be a better choice than the Zaskar. However, for shorter, more intense rides the Zaskar would be better. Furthermore if one is older in years and/or with recurring injuries in the neck/back, that would be another influence in frame decision.
I don't think peopel are ridiculing aluminium, just that they would prefer ti, given the chance.
But it is easier to ding an aluminium frame than ti, those big fat, thin wall tubes are just begging to take a wack. Doesn't mean it will happen, just things that "may" not trouble a steel or ti frame will ding an aluminium downtube.
As to taking 3psi out of your tyres, not really that simple, may as well snip a few spokes out of your wheels. I don't really want to run any less pressure. But really I'm happy to ride anything, I just like Ti, it tickles my fancy.