MikeD, you are oh so wrong. When properly designed and integrated into a full surface area dropout and a butted tube, they track well and perform flawlessly. Unfortunately, I think you've experienced the poor examples of the past.
The choice of the 1.0 tubing was determined around the integrated design with the hooded dropout I was finally able to source through Paragon. The machined Ti dropout allows for full surface area contact with the terminal end of the blade, resisting the torsional forces that make so many plug and tab style Ti forks perform like spaghetti. Add in butted tubing that places material where you need it, and it's a combination that just plain functions; absorptive on the rough stuff yet tracks true.
The key to remember, it's still a rigid bike and no matter what material your fork is made of, it will not perform like a suspension model. An educated consumer makes a happy end user.
rody
The choice of the 1.0 tubing was determined around the integrated design with the hooded dropout I was finally able to source through Paragon. The machined Ti dropout allows for full surface area contact with the terminal end of the blade, resisting the torsional forces that make so many plug and tab style Ti forks perform like spaghetti. Add in butted tubing that places material where you need it, and it's a combination that just plain functions; absorptive on the rough stuff yet tracks true.
The key to remember, it's still a rigid bike and no matter what material your fork is made of, it will not perform like a suspension model. An educated consumer makes a happy end user.
rody