Retrobike Touring.

For a single night a bivvy bag is tempting - you can have reasonable certainty about the weather. For a longer trip I think the extra 1kg or so of a tent is well worth it.
 
Re:

I was in Dorset yesterday so I hit the road with the Kona. I was near Wareham to start with then > Dorchester > Bridport > West Bay > Weymouth > Portland Bill > back to the start. Total was about 80 miles, as I only had the rack bag on I was much quicker than last weekend! The weather was mostly overcast, but I escaped getting wet. I stopped at Dorchester for breakfast, West Bay for coffee (£1!) and then had a sandwich on Portland - not a whole lot of food for 6 hours pedalling....

SP
 

Attachments

  • Portland_Bill.webp
    Portland_Bill.webp
    29 KB · Views: 604
  • West_Bay.webp
    West_Bay.webp
    79.6 KB · Views: 605
  • Cider.webp
    Cider.webp
    34 KB · Views: 604
awesome!!!! i used to live on the naval estate across the moorland from portland bill, loved it.
 
Re:

Well, looks like topic is slowly overtaken by not so retro bikes, so I will post one of my rigs, also not 100% retro but hopefully it fits.



Frame will be for sell in few days, btw, so if somebody is interested shoot me PM.
 
Any reason why you put the panniers on the front? I see loads of Americans seem to do this; my bikes ride and steer better with only something light on the front.
 
Re:

Full of inspiration from this thread, I decided I want to do some touring too.
I thought my most suitable rig would be the 1989 Avanti, which has lived on the indoor trainer for the past 3 months so I can get my strength back after a bad accident. In fact I've never ridden this bike yet other than indoors.
I bought front and rear Axiom pannier racks and a Brooks Conquest saddle for it and began dreaming in Sustrans routes.



531? Check. Slack geometry? Check. Solid, reliable running gear? Check.



.....Rack mounts? Negative :facepalm: I completely overlooked that detail! :roll:



Doesn't even have eyelets or an effing bridge for mudguards!
But it's okay, I don't mind making brackets and fittings for it.



I also need to hacksaw the handy little pump pegs off so the rack can sit level.
The front racks didn't fit well either. I was told I'd need to purchase a special longer skewer..... I just used a spare rear on the front instead and it's fine :lol:
P clips for the fork legs should sort the top mounts out too but I'm thinking about making something more stout.
Once I've sorted those things and once I'm able to do the mileage on the trainer I'm going to put some suitable tyres on and do a 3 day wild camping trip for its maiden voyage, hopefully late May-June :D
 
Looks ideal! Check heel clearance on your panniers before you take the hacksaw to those lovely pump pegs. :wink: I tend to run with the rack tilted back a little in preference to setting the panniers rearwards.
 
hamster":3pe7tcnh said:
Any reason why you put the panniers on the front? I see loads of Americans seem to do this; my bikes ride and steer better with only something light on the front.


Heheh :) actually 2 reasons and to be honest you named one of them quite well - it's all that craziness going on www with fancy pictures of fancy bikes loaded up front. And the second (and I would like to say the main, for my defense:) ) was that this bike doesn't have rear rack mounts.

I agree with you 100%, I didn't like a feeling with heavy front end at all. It's one of the reasons why this frame is now for sale.
 
I'd missed the lack of rear lugs. Indeed it's often more lowly mid-range frames that actually make better tourers. A heavier tubeset that feels a little leaden becomes stable and accurate for a tourer. The shorter top tubes of non-race-orientated frames is also an advantage.
 
Back
Top