Retrobike quotients #1 and #2

[john]

These could be the two most important quotients to hit the world of retrobikes. Following months of calculations and fine tuning on my sinclair zx80 I give you the first two retrobike quotients.

Retrobike Quotient #1

= Number of retrobikes owned / Total number of bikes owned (i.e. retro + modern)

So for myself I have 17 bikes, 13 of which are retro. Therefore my retrobike quotient #1 = 13/17 = 0.76

Which is OK I reckon.

Retrobike Quotient #2

= Number of complete retrobikes / Total number of retrobikes bikes owned (i.e. complete + those in bits + those not even started)

Once again using myself as an example of the 13 retrobike I have only 4 are actually in one piece. Therefore quotient #2 = 4/13 = 0.31

Which is not good.


Please note the following
You decide what is retro and not. If you aren't sure click any thread posted over the last 2 or 3 weeks for a discussion on what is or is not retro. If you still aren't sure I don't care.
No more than two decimal places accuracy please.
Once a few have posted I will complete detailed statistical analysis in order to establish acceptable bounds for each quotient.

 

[ededwards]

Quotient 1 = 0.92

Quotient 2 = 0.92

Conclusion: sorry Luddite who spends more time in maintenance than riding. Fair enough really

 

[Russell]

Q1 .57

Q2 .75

7 bikes in the garage with the bias being towards retro and 75% of them in one piece. Not too shabby.

 

[The Ken]

Q1 4/4 = 1
Q2 3/4 = 0.75

edited for stupidity

 

[orange71]

Q1: .89

Q2: .87

 

[daj]

1, 83%
2, 20% :shock:

Conclusion

Only take one bike apart at a time :roll:

 

[Bike Hoarder]

Quotient No. 1 = 0.71

Quotient No. 2 = 0.5

 

[FluffyChicken]

#1 = 1.00
#2 = 0.00

 

[Chris]

Quotient 1 = 0.87

Quotient 2 = 0.28

but what does it mean :shock:

Yes i've got more retro than modern, but they are mostly in pieces :roll:

 

[NickD]

Quotient 1 = 1

Quotient 2 = 0.4