Quite, done cheaply with whatever was in the parts bin. Probably because it saved 2 mins in assembly, too.There doesn't seem to be any reason for an e-type mech on that frame. Go for a clamp on one, if your drive train is lx, why not match it.
Quite, done cheaply with whatever was in the parts bin. Probably because it saved 2 mins in assembly, too.There doesn't seem to be any reason for an e-type mech on that frame. Go for a clamp on one, if your drive train is lx, why not match it.
The side initially. But then finagled some things and now it's not rubbing, but now the teeth and the cage are more than 5 mm apart when it should be around 1-3 mm. Almost 90% sure I'm going to switch out to a clamp style at this point. Will post back on the forum how it goes. Will try some of the previous suggestions first. If it doesn't work, then clamp it is!When you say ‘in the way’ and needs to ‘move down’ is the chain rubbing on the side of the chain or the top?
For speed / de-skilled bike assembly at the factory - alignment/height adjustment designed in.Makes me wonder what the point of this type of mech was for really.
Early days of full-sus reaching the market, and 1x chain retention and wide cassettes yet to be designed.Pretty sure the E type was to accommodated full suspension frames where pivots were seat tube used to be.
Out of curiosity I had a look anyway and all are adjustable in two positions from LX to XTR via a little 'flip chip' and two position mounting bolt slot arrangement.
View attachment 889439
Left to right: LX 569, LX MEGA 9, XT M739, XT M739, XTR M950.
De-skilling assembly, and also increasing incompatibility and future adjustability, so reducing repairability.For speed / de-skilled bike assembly at the factory - alignment/height adjustment designed in.