Just click on Retro MTB Chat below, and then click on John on the moderators line towards the top and you can PM him.kaledi":3aqmuqtt said:Can you tell me where to find John for the catalog?
Aaron was getting quite interested in researching the provenance of the bike. Maybe somebody made him a full offer, but if not it wouldn't surprise me if he decided to keep it.Ductape":22uq5fh9 said:Did anyone buy that black Ku?
Anthony":225zgg47 said:Yes, we had already worked out that Aaron's 95 Ku probably wasn't made by Teesdale because it has no TET stamp on the bb shell, but this seems to confirm it. I wonder whether it might have been made by Mountain Goat before they went out of business/changed their name to Altitude Cycles. And maybe one or other party was coy about saying so.
It says on the Kona site that the 98 Ku was made of Columbus Altec 7005 Megatube, the only year when the Ku was made of a different tube from the Kula. So that would explain the more mega tube profile you recall. It would have been painted by VeloGraphics in Bellingham, so maybe the one you saw there was a cancelled order that had found its way into that shop. It says that the price was $900 (£800 in the UK), but that was for a single colour, I don't know how much more a fancier colour scheme would have cost.
http://www.klassickona.com/oldgold/98bi ... einfo.html
The only one I have a picture of is the green one shown on the first page of this thread. I think that down tube is bigger (and presumably thinner-gauge) than the one on the Kula, but perhaps not what you'd call massive. The Kona Custom frames did have size-specific tubing, so I suppose that could be a possible explanation for the frame you saw having fatter tubes than the green one.kaledi":2ilruzf9 said:The use of Columbus tubes does explain the lasting impression I have of that Ku. Have you seen any 1998 Ku's in the flesh or via photos? The down tube was absolutely massive on the Ku I saw