Canuck":3w2c7msx said:No seat post clamp make's it undoubtedly not from '91
True 'dat
G
Canuck":3w2c7msx said:No seat post clamp make's it undoubtedly not from '91
The lack of a brazed-on seat clamp combined with the geometry identifies it as a 92 frame. There is some confusion over the style of the rack mounts on top of the seatstays. Some people say that is a mark of the lower models, but I think in fact all Konas from the first part of the 92 model year had that style, but during the year they went over to fitting them in the stay itself, again on all models, so I don't think that helps. The style of the seat tube where it meets the bottom bracket shell seems to be the one that looks narrow from the side and wider from the front. That style is found on the Cinder Cone/Lava Dome, as well as the Fire Mountain and Hahanna. I think the weight of around five pounds pushes us towards the Cinder Cone/Lava Dome, as I believe the FM and Hahanna were the best part of six pounds at that time. [MTB builders started to get the light weight bug from 93 and 94 onwards, but in 92 they were still into strength.]Froggy":r53go1pf said:Thanks Anthony, may I Invite myself into your vast knowledge and ask Was it the Clear Dedisgned by Joe Murray decal, that gives my frame it's '92 age?
I gave her the old tapping accustic along the tubes which seems unchanging, not like a butted construction. The frame weighs 5lbs ish. Cheers
Froggy":112qzylg said:https://picasaweb.google.com/111574695116377709948/BajaSMTB
Reposted link for unknown frame Thanks