"May I take this opportunity to apologize for any offence I have caused through the article in last weekend’s Mail on Sunday. It was never my intention to offend the many cyclists who share our roads across the country. What was intended to be a humorous piece was clearly misjudged. Further more I do not condone any form of reckless driving.
Once again, I am sincerely sorry for any upset caused in relation to this article."
It doesn't look like a humorous piece to me - it may be an attempt to make fun of people he doesn't like, but surely there's far more malice in it than there is humour?
What I find most pathetic though is the final sentence, which is about as blatant a lie as you'll find, and typical of so-called TV personalities. What he means is that he's sincerely sorry that he's in trouble, but he thinks that by being smarmy and false about it he'll get off and be able to carry on being a rich smug jerk exacly as before. Sadly he's probably right.
Once again, I am sincerely sorry for any upset caused in relation to this article."
It doesn't look like a humorous piece to me - it may be an attempt to make fun of people he doesn't like, but surely there's far more malice in it than there is humour?
What I find most pathetic though is the final sentence, which is about as blatant a lie as you'll find, and typical of so-called TV personalities. What he means is that he's sincerely sorry that he's in trouble, but he thinks that by being smarmy and false about it he'll get off and be able to carry on being a rich smug jerk exacly as before. Sadly he's probably right.