Is it just me, or is this bike really sexy?

[Spokesmann]

In a word. No.

 

[Bats]

I'm impressed by how none of the parts match, and how the paint looks exactly like you'd see on a cheap swing set. And also how the handlebar/stem setup couldn't fit any human being who's ever lived.

 

[The History Man]

Do you think he's got it yet?

 

[greencat]

Re:

I kinda like it. I do like that shade of green. The mismatched blingtastic wheels would definitely have to go, as would the handle bars and the toe clips.

 

[Bats]

Shade of green says to me "i sprayed this in my back yard with some stuff I got at wilkys". Straight front fork says Argos fixie. I can honestly say the only thing on this bike worth saving is the gear hub and the saddle. Even the chainset is ugly.

 

[k-rod]

I would guess the 'mis-matched' wheels were set up that intentionally ... part of the 'off-the-cuff' aesthetic.

Perhaps a wee bit too complex, for many on here to appreciate (... if it ain't paint by numbers ...)

 

[The History Man]

I would guess the 'mis-matched' wheels were set up that intentionally ... part of the 'off-the-cuff' aesthetic.

Perhaps a wee bit too complex, for many on here to appreciate (... if it ain't paint by numbers ...)

You obviously haven't seen the broom.

 

[keithglos]

Re:

For the second time this year I find myself agreeing with Mike (Spokesmann)

Although I was more interested in making bike go better, the paint being secondary, those tan leather saddles are sickening, and totally wrong for "retro" bikes.

Keith

 

[bagpuss]

Re:

:facepalm: :facepalm: :facepalm: :facepalm: & :facepalm:

 

[Retro Spud]

It's just you.

Jez I went back to page one to have a look and now I've just chucked up
I think THM was being kind when he posted