How tall are you?

How tall are you?

  • between 160cm and 170 (62,9" and 66,9")

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • between 171cm and 180 (67" and 70,8")

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • between 181cm and 190 (70,9" and 74,8")

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • between 191cm and 200 (74,9" and 78,4")

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0
5'11" (180cm), 32" inside leg, Kona 19", Tomac 18", Ozone 17".

I am sure I have read about pervs grooming people on the internet and getting personal details!

Oh yeah, and Defiant, you have to shift the numbers down a bit as it is a well-known fact that blokes lie about their height and pretend they are 6 ft tall! lol - my hang-up is about not being 6'4" as both my Dad and brother are - at 5'11" I am the runt of the litter!
 
5'4"

At 5'4" I'm not short, I am vertically challenged.
It may not seem that short but I have ducks disease :( , this basically means my arse is too close to the ground. :shock:

Looking by the results I am in the land of giants (physical not mental) :LOL:
Maybe I should stop building up the S works and start on hotrocks to suite my size. They would be easier to get hold of :roll:
No wonder I have such trouble getting the smaller frames and when I do there is such an interest in them that price soars.
Oh well, It is how it is and I am happy with my lot really, I am sure I should be more concerned with my mental than physical state ;)
Jamie
 
Amazing, the individual heights of any given population shows a pretty much Gaussian distribution; just like what my lecturer at college said it would. There you go kids, statistics comes to life!

I'll ignore the skew and blame how the data is grouped, although there is some mileage in arguing taller people have a pre-disposition to cycling. Hmmmmmm :? I guess if you overlayed this with the general population there would be a genuine trend.

God i'm bored.
 
Tallpaul":69575up7 said:
Amazing, the individual heights of any given population shows a pretty much Gaussian distribution; just like what my lecturer at college said it would. There you go kids, statistics comes to life!

......

God i'm bored.

Read Taleb's Black Swan if you're bored. Fascinating. Clever guy.

(Fooled by Randomness is a better read, though)

Thread continues below .... :)
 
Tallpaul":2svobgyu said:
Amazing, the individual heights of any given population shows a pretty much Gaussian distribution; just like what my lecturer at college said it would. There you go kids, statistics comes to life!

I'll ignore the skew and blame how the data is grouped, although there is some mileage in arguing taller people have a pre-disposition to cycling. Hmmmmmm :? I guess if you overlayed this with the general population there would be a genuine trend.

God i'm bored.

I assume you have already performed a test of normality?
We could orgainse data by demographic or style of bike, perform ANOVA analysis and see if there is statistically any difference.
Possibilities are endless....
Current sample of 'slack persons at work on Fri am, but not working' may skew data though :?


6'
33" Inside leg
Usually about 18-19" Frame and L-o-t-s of post :)
 
gump":pckv0bt9 said:
I assume you have already performed a test of normality?
We could orgainse data by demographic or style of bike, perform ANOVA analysis and see if there is statistically any difference.
Possibilities are endless....
Current sample of 'slack persons at work on Fri am, but not working' may skew data though :?

I think Normality is assumed here.

I'd probably just go for a t-test to compare these data with that of the general population. I'm not sure Analysis of Variance is required to cover two sets of data.

Indeed, posture through being utterly lazy is gonna cock things right up :D
 
Tallpaul":2ue8jj4l said:
gump":2ue8jj4l said:
I assume you have already performed a test of normality?
We could orgainse data by demographic or style of bike, perform ANOVA analysis and see if there is statistically any difference.
Possibilities are endless....
Current sample of 'slack persons at work on Fri am, but not working' may skew data though :?

I think Normality is assumed here.

I'd probably just go for a t-test to compare these data with that of the general population. I'm not sure Analysis of Variance is required to cover two sets of data.

Indeed, posture through being utterly lazy is gonna cock things right up :D


erm.... er....

I like custard creams?
 
Back
Top