highlandsflyer
Retro Wizard
- Feedback
- View
You read me like a book, Sylus. OK, perhaps a pamphlet. A leaflet, even.
bm0p700f":6n2t9gho said:I still can't unsrstand why some poeple have a problem with this law. To me its simply common sense that you are free to marry anyone you want so long as they want to marry you. Everyone who oppose is hung upon definations. They assume that is because that is the way it has been that is the way it should. Life is repleat with stuff that has always been but should not be. Gay marriage to me is no different.
GT-Steve":3nri8zb8 said:The subject of this thread is gay marriage.
I don't have a single aversion to two people loving eachother and expressing that in a human spiritual form infront of witnesses.
Two men and two women together cannot procreate the human race. Am I wrong? No. Our own personal experiences of child birth and 'being' on this planet are a seperate subject, yes? Two men or two women together (sexually) cannot extend our being on this planet. That is my point here.
The Importance of Gourd Crafting:sylus":2ph2vhg0 said:I used to go to the local stables for meat
GT-Steve":4f6rvmcf said:The subject of this thread is gay marriage.
I don't have a single aversion to two people loving eachother and expressing that in a human spiritual form infront of witnesses.
Two men and two women together cannot procreate the human race. Am I wrong? No. Our own personal experiences of child birth and 'being' on this planet are a seperate subject, yes? Two men or two women together (sexually) cannot extend our being on this planet. That is my point here.
Bram J":3mwf3c77 said:GT-Steve":3mwf3c77 said:The subject of this thread is gay marriage.
I don't have a single aversion to two people loving eachother and expressing that in a human spiritual form infront of witnesses.
Two men and two women together cannot procreate the human race. Am I wrong? No. Our own personal experiences of child birth and 'being' on this planet are a seperate subject, yes? Two men or two women together (sexually) cannot extend our being on this planet. That is my point here.
If you have to procreate 'naturally' you would indeed need a man and a woman. But procreation is not the point of marriage. Some people marry and choose to not have children. Certainly we should respect their choice. However, two people choosing not to have children cannot extend our being on this planet! Thus, if heterosexual individuals don't have the duty to ensure our future existence, then why would homosexuals do? Truth of course is that none of us does. Homosexual couples are fully aware they can't have children the 'natural' way, but they can however take care of children whose parents cannot. Win - win.
Plus, it is exactly an excessive procreation that is threatening our future existence rather than an insufficient one.