M-Power
Old School Grand Master
technodup":9hxhadvo said:Which handily also sets out the process for re-admittance. Which of course makes this statementJohnH":9hxhadvo said:http://www.lisbon-treaty.org/wcm/the-lisbon-treaty/treaty-on-european-union-and-comments/title-6-final-provisions/137-article-50.htmlutter bollocks as previously mentioned.hamster":9hxhadvo said:A Leave vote would be forever
5. If a State which has withdrawn from the Union asks to rejoin, its request shall be subject to the procedure referred to in Article 49.
(My emphasis. We can't be towed anywhere, that much is true. Which means we will still be a European state. And article 2 is agreement to law, equality and human rights, so we'll not be vetoed on that.)Article 49":9hxhadvo said:Any European State which respects the values referred to in Article 2 and is committed to promoting them may apply to become a member of the Union. The European Parliament and national Parliaments shall be notified of this application. The applicant State shall address its application to the Council, which shall act unanimously after consulting the Commission and after receiving the assent of the European Parliament, which shall act by an absolute majority of its component members. The conditions of admission and the adjustments to the Treaties on which the Union is founded, which such admission entails, shall be the subject of an agreement between the Member States and the applicant State. This agreement shall be submitted for ratification by all the contracting States in accordance with their respective constitutional requirements. The conditions of eligibility agreed upon by the European Council shall be taken into account.
This thread is about impartial facts. I can't say the EU itself is impartial, but the facts are clear. Something Mr FT seems to have missed, or more likely misrepresented (or misspoken in parliamentary language). Or to use common parlance, lied about.
Awesome to see it enshrined in the Lisbon Treaty