dSLR Advice

JohnH":1ex0k3io said:
I'm going to a "70s" themed party on Saturday night and will be taking my retro SLR. I'm just hoping that no-one realises that the OM20 was released in 1983.... ;)
Ah, crap! Had a wander around my house with the OM20, to see what shutter speed I could expect from artificial light using a 200 ASA film....
Answer: between 1/4 and 1/8 sec with the aperture fully open. :roll:

So it looks like I'll either be taking the Dynax 505 (with built-in flash) or my poxy Samsung digital compact. Not very retro.... :(
 
JohnH":j89mjflp said:
JohnH":j89mjflp said:
I'm going to a "70s" themed party on Saturday night and will be taking my retro SLR. I'm just hoping that no-one realises that the OM20 was released in 1983.... ;)
Ah, crap! Had a wander around my house with the OM20, to see what shutter speed I could expect from artificial light using a 200 ASA film....
Answer: between 1/4 and 1/8 sec with the aperture fully open. :roll:

So it looks like I'll either be taking the Dynax 505 (with built-in flash) or my poxy Samsung digital compact. Not very retro.... :(

For period correctness use Tri-X developed in D-76 and push it by two stops (expose at EI 1600). :cool:
And for more early 70's period correctness you should have one of these :cool: ;)
 

Attachments

  • M-1.jpg
    M-1.jpg
    50.3 KB · Views: 2,459
However the 550d does seam to be more than the 500d.

Although I bought a 500D not long ago because it didn't seem to offer enough over the 550D to make up for the considerable (at the time) price difference :)
 
MikeD":lrc56ogj said:
However the 550d does seam to be more than the 500d.

Although I bought a 500D not long ago because it didn't seem to offer enough over the 550D to make up for the considerable (at the time) price difference :)

Not much difference in price at the mo.The 550d body price has dropped to half what it was 10 months or so ago.

Need to go and play with one and make sure it's not to cheap feeling
 
Mm. I think the 550 was £150 more at the time. Didn't seem worth it. Very happy with the 500. The tinyness of the entry-level Canons takes some getting used to, though.
 
I would go with one of the xxD rather than a xxxD due to the better body construction and the inclusion of the dial on the back for control. I have had a 350D, a 400D and a 40D over the years and the difference between the xxxD and xxD versions is very noticeable.

Think about what you are going to shoot as decent lenses are your best investment and will carry though to different bodies as long as you stick with Canon.
 
I would go with one of the xxD rather than a xxxD due to the better body construction and the inclusion of the dial on the back for control. I have had a 350D, a 400D and a 40D over the years and the difference between the xxxD and xxD versions is very noticeable.

I went from a 35mm EOS 50 to a 300D years ago and certainly missed the dial then. But I got used to it - it's no harder to thumb a button and use the main dial than it is to twiddle the secondary dial. I definitely didn't miss it enough to pay several hundred extra pounds for it come upgrade time :)

Construction is a fair point, and the xxDs are clearly a league above the xxxDs for solidity. But my very plastic 300D is still going strong after seven years of abuse, and I value light weight :)

If there's no budget restrictions then the more solid chassis may well be worthwhile, but I reckon there's a strong case for putting the money into lenses.

Although I've just noticed that DigitalRev are doing 60Ds for £620, which seems like a billy bargain :)
 
I went from a 450d to a 1D mark II, however the most important thing on a camera are the lenses. Spend as much as you can on lenses, I've got a 16-35mm f2.8 and a 70-200mm f2.8 and although they are over a grand each I'll be keeping them for ever - camera bodies come and go. It seems every year there is a newer, better version of cameras. What type of photography you want to shoot as high ISO performance, fps etc all matter.

Getting back to camera bodies something like a 40d can be had for a small amount and are very capable - how much you looking to spend, buying a secondhand body and then spending more on lenses would be my way of doing it.

Any questions get in touch.

Cheers


Matt
 
Although I use a Nikon digital SLR, I am finding I am using it in exactly the same way as I used to use my film SLR, a Pentax MX, hardly if anything of the built in programming, so to all intents are purposes, my camera is the same as I was used to but in a digital media. Now I have been doing photography for a good thirty years in fact, hang on, age 6 I got hold of a box brownie, so 36 years and have tried most mediums and size of film except the plate cameras and even at one time held an LRPS in photography I in the past used to run a camera club and a darkroom. But now I am finding photography is everywhere, the digital medium has made that so and due to the ease of photography now and it's almost instant applications some worrying aspects are coming to light, which I understand is initiating this everyone believes they can become famous attitude, you know the youth and others and such tv programmes set up to capture the attitude. I have just recently written a paper referencing the late Susan Sontag and the new photographic revolution that has caused me to think on how I use photography. I recommend Sontag's writings on the subject, they do make you think

Worth reading;

http://a.parsons.edu/~creanm/narrative/narrative_readings/sontag_torture.pdf


But of cameras one has to ask themselves to what purpose are they going to put the camera, if it is mostly online and computer viewing what do you need the camera for, if one intends to print, what size do you wish to print to, what is most likely, again consider the camera, as I tell you what, lugging a dslr and lenses around is not always fun and it does inhibit oneself quite a bit.

Now a step forward for me in cameras, is what I had in the past, a robust manual slr that has a digital back, I got the old Pentax M series for a reason, they were tiny, I used to carry the MX as my main camera ( no batteries) black and white media and an ME super body ( watch batteries),as my back up, snappy colour media camera, autofocus I had via the use of lenses and the hyperfocal distance method and it was faster than the motorised digital lenses and silent too. At one time I used to carry both camera bodies one in each pocket of my jacket and lenses elsewhere on me, but always to hand and no gadget bag to carry. One thing film always made you think, before depressing that release button, was did you really need that picture, and was it framed right, Now we are living in a world of throw away images and everyone and everything is camera fodder to throw away, or in computer parlance; delete.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top