Crankset Clearance Margins of Error

Johnsqual

Senior Retro Guru
Hello,

I am trying to find a crankset that will fit a bike I have with a wide rear triangle. It's a bloody nightmare.

Short question: is 5mm clearance on either side of the chainstays enough? Does it leave sufficient margin for error when fitting the cranks?

The bike is a modern steel cyclocross frame with a BB86 bottom bracket.

The rear triangle is 118mm at the point where the cranks meet the triangle. When I fitted a Campagnolo Power Torque crank, the end of the cranks hit against the drive side chainstay - the q-factor (plus width of the crank is too narrow).

I've since found that some triple cranks might have a wide enough q factor (just) to fit the frame.
E.g. some of FSAs triple cranks have a q-factor of 159mm. This gives about 5mm clearance on each side of the rear triangle: 118mm + 15mm x 2 (width of the crank arms) = 148mm; 159-148 = 11mm/2 = 5.5mm

But is 5.5mm enough clearance? Most of my other bikes have more like 10mm clearance, and there's not much room for error if the cranks actually sit a bit closer to the frame. Obviously I don't fancy setting everything up only to find I've got another useless crankset. Furthermore, a BB86 BB doesn't seem to allow for using spacers between the BB and the BB shell.

I did find Surly's Mr Whirly cranks which have an enormous Q factor (170mm) but they are for a normal hollowtech threaded BB and seem to require at least one spacer on the drive side to fit properly. So I'm not sure if they would work with a BB86 - and they are very expensive if I am wrong!

Sorry for the longish post, wanted to get all the details in there.

Thanks for any ideas...
 
I would think 5mm is OK if there is any flex in the crank arm it would be during the front of the stroke rather than the rear but will there be enough clearance between the chain stay and chain ring
 
Re:

Good point about the inner ring. FSA helpfully sent me a chart with the required measurments, and the clearance for the inner ring could be a problem. But I will
probably just leave the granny ring off and use the two outer rings anyway.

Bit of a bugger really, having to buy a triple then set it up as a double. This frame has
been quite badly designed, but I am sort of stuck with it and hopefully I can solve the problems.

Cheers,

John
 
Back
Top