raidan73":1a5zwjq1 said:
devonXC":1a5zwjq1 said:
sinnerman":1a5zwjq1 said:
Nah you(you're) right, no need for rules, old threads are a waste of time, there (they're) not used for reference at all they simply become redundant and never used by OCD bike riders and should be disposed off(of) like everything else.
So on that note, please accept this bicycle picture for this months entry for BOTM.
Viva la revolution
If you come closer to your computer display you'll hear the thundering WHOOOOOOSH of my post going over your head
I think half the point was a defence of the forum and the BotM rules, at least that's what I took from it. There's plenty of people here who have contributed a lot to the forum and have been here for years, posting regularly, through thick and thin. People aren't always going to agree but this is a generally friendly forum where we welcome new members. Perhaps you can see how someone who's been here a couple of days and is already posting that some rules are "ridiculous" might go against the grain a little?
Adrian, your doing a grand job, and you need a medal.
My original comment was little more than an attempt on my part to point out we have rules to make it a level playing field for all. Nothing more.
With recent multiple same entries, Bikes missing parts, trying to keep the train on the track is always a good idea, especially when the Nah Sayers and Facebook Activists are constantly trying to back handly derail the entire site and across multiple threads.
As for Regan, its not the first time, hes had a paddy in the past, shame, because he builds a grand bike, but we arent at school.
Devon XC, nothing went over my head, i just found your playground even more amusing than your pal Regans. I fear your sense of humour trailing somewhat because you clearly never got the point i made. (if you knew Marin Man, you and regan might get the irony-) C'est la Vie.
So with the playground now in the great distance can we please Enter some bikes the way we use too....?
Some great entries so far.