Best Non Aero levers and cantilevers

[vcballbat]

Gran-Compe and Mafac Racer with modern pads, levers look cool, fairly cheap and replacement hoods also very cheap

 

[non-fixie]

@non-fixie

Would you say the Universal Levers/ Mafac combination is more effective then?

I have both and haven't noticed a difference in performance, but I haven't actually done a proper comparison test either.

They do feel different, though. I find the flatter tops of the Universal bodies, combined with the full covers, a bit more comfortable than the MAFAC levers.

Here's the MAFAC-Universal combo on my Toortelboom:

 

[non-fixie]

I like MAFAC cantilevers and run them on several of my touring bikes and, because with those period-correctness is less of a consideration, I like to combine them with early Campagnolo Ergo levers. Besides their ability to shift vintage 5 and 6-speed transmissions, they are more comfortable, make braking 'from the hoods' easier, and there are no brake cables to get in the way when accessing a front bag.

 

[Tommy27]

I'm currently running Brifters on my Roberts, but I wanted to experiment with non-aero and friction bar end levers on the Bridgestone that's going to replace it. I've used aero and friction bar ends before and I've bikes with non aero levers (both Mafac combos) so it might be interesting to try and different set of levers. I suppose replacement hoods and maybe other parts are more easily available for Mafac, but I know Tre Emme do the replacement Universal hoods.

 

[doctor-bond]

View attachment 900897

Good point on the advantage of aero for bags. & Nice Ostrich. What’s the handlebar support - the stem attachment is useful.