Bar ends yay or nay?

[Suprachrgd82]

At a time when narrow handlebars were popular, bar ends allowed the rider to gain back some leverage on the bars to use a stronger muscle group for climbing.

I still think bar ends and brake boosters are hella cool. Notsomuch tie-dye or neon shoe laces, but it’s an indicator of an “enthusiast”.

 

[DesertRyder]

All my bikes are vintage 80's and 90's except for 1 bike. I still use bar ends on a couple of bikes and I also recently switched over from bar ends to a Scott AT-4 set up on my 1990 E-stay bike.

 

[greencat]

Definitely around in the early 90s. I found they were essential for long rides for providing multiple hand positions, especially if touring (more people had one bike which did everything back then). The advantage for me in offroad hill climbing was enabling an even more stretched position so the front end wouldn't come up.

 

[retrobiker273891]

Sorry if I sounded harsh, I wasn't being critical. I don't know anything about your history, or health, should have read the first post better. I would say that for your type of riding, the main benefit of bar ends would be the extra hand positions. Being able to move your hands changes the way your body is working, can provide relief and comfort on longer road and gravel rides. Akin to a rider on the hoods or in the drops on a road bike

A very gentlemanly reply.

 

[retrobiker273891]

Bar ends (bards)? You bet! I use them whenever possible on the bike that I ride. The really tough thing is being able to find a design that is both ergonomic in design and has an opening at the end (like for putting a handlebar bar plug) to insert mount a mirror on.

I think the shortish ones with a slight curve at the top would be my preferred, giving the 90 degree angle and an extra one at the top of the curve. The big L ones seem excessive I think. I had those back in the day and don't recall the extra L extension being that much good as I remember feeling that it was pretty much the same angle as with hands on the bars, but just somewhat higher.

Though would be interested to hear if people have different opinions on that. It was a long time ago so no particular strong opinions.

 

[retrobiker273891]

All my bikes are vintage 80's and 90's except for 1 bike. I still use bar ends on a couple of bikes and I also recently switched over from bar ends to a Scott AT-4 set up on my 1990 E-stay bike.

Why you going big-big on those chains sir? More than one bike too so repeat offender!

 

[al-onestare]

It's all down to personal preference.

Bitd I loved them but now, no thanks.

 

[DesertRyder]

Why you going big-big on those chains sir? More than one bike too so repeat offender!

Meh...I never noticed it. I don't ride in that gear, ever.

 

[retrobiker273891]

Meh...I never noticed it. I don't ride in that gear, ever.

Not to be a stickler but leaving it stored in that gear is even worse as it will constantly be under maximum strain.

That is what I understand from what were the no-no gears anyway as the chain will be stretched constantly.

Only saying for your benefit, you can of course do what you want with your bikes.

 

[DesertRyder]

Not to be a stickler but leaving it stored in that gear is even worse as it will constantly be under maximum strain.

That is what I understand from what were the no-no gears anyway as the chain will be stretched constantly.

Only saying for your benefit, you can of course do what you want with your bikes.

If I'd have to hazard a guess, I'd say I probably was working on the bike. After adjustments, on the work stand, I normally will run through all the gears. The big/big would be the final gear. Hence, the final position. Obviously it wouldn't stay there because the final step is a ride.