Any preferences?

Length of frame dictates fit (given period geometry and style).
A 22" toptube is m/l (usually 19") often suiting a rider 5'10-6'
17" frane size is usually 21.5" tt of this period.
Toptube measurement is usually horizontal c to c, casks "virtual toptube"
Thanks but could you translate that for a novice?😂🤷‍♂️
 
So it isn’t a 17’’ frame you mean?
Some manufacturers measured frame size from the centre of the bottom bracket to the top of the seat tube (c-t) and others measured from the centre of the bottom bracket to the centre of where the top tube (tt) meets the seat tube (c-c). If I remember correctly, Marin did the latter, so a 17" Marin could be about 19" if measured to the top of the seat tube. The top tube on a 17" (c-c) 1995 Pine Mountain is 57 or 58 cm (I can't remember which and I no longer have the bike).

The horizontal measurement is the top tube measurement from the centre of the head tube to the centre of the seat tube. (Now that most top tubes are sloping, the measurement for a 'virtual' horizontal top tube is more often quoted.) Entry level bikes tended to have slightly shorter top tubes, giving a more relaxed riding position; higher end, racier bikes tended to be a little longer, giving a longer and lower position.
 
Some manufacturers measured frame size from the centre of the bottom bracket to the top of the seat tube (c-t) and others measured from the centre of the bottom bracket to the centre of where the top tube (tt) meets the seat tube (c-c). If I remember correctly, Marin did the latter, so a 17" Marin could be about 19" if measured to the top of the seat tube. The top tube on a 17" (c-c) 1995 Pine Mountain is 57 or 58 cm (I can't remember which and I no longer have the bike).

The horizontal measurement is the top tube measurement from the centre of the head tube to the centre of the seat tube. (Now that most top tubes are sloping, the measurement for a 'virtual' horizontal top tube is more often quoted.) Entry level bikes tended to have slightly shorter top tubes, giving a more relaxed riding position; higher end, racier bikes tended to be a little longer, giving a longer and lower position.
Hello! Thanks for the info and also boohoo! Gutted so yeah the Marin prob is too big for me unfortunately. Why can’t bike manufacturers just make things to a single standard way so everyone knows where they stand
 
Fyi...its about 1.5" on top. So 17" marin measurement c to c, will be 18.5" c to top.

Unless you have short arms to body or your after a bike for xc racing, i wouldn't be put off by going a size up....for general use they can be more comfortable.

The smallest they made was 15" ...so your 17" is a medium.

Ask the height at mid top tube to floor....if you can stand over ok, then its all good.
 
Back
Top