And today I did......
- Thread starter kaiser
- Start date
velomaniac
MacRetro Rider
Its not retro but in a retro spirit whats gone before was the rules for then. Only the new can have new rules so stone age fat bike rules are not outmoded, at least on retrobike.
On UKfatbikes where this debate should really be the definitions can be beaten out !
On UKfatbikes where this debate should really be the definitions can be beaten out !
velomaniac
MacRetro Rider
Funny though the conversation stopper comes from a guy seldom seen on a retrobike 
Alas Velo you missed the thrust of my post, it was to highlight to futile need to pigeonhole everything( as seen in the thousand or so 'What is Retro' threads). As for seldom being seen on a retrobike well, I'd certainly agree with that, I've oft said my interest is mostly in collecting these days and the very very occasional ride. But I would say what I do have is more 'retro' than you and more in keeping with the original premise of the site than your own bikes....but that would be churlish and I would never apply my own reasons for being here onto anyone else
velomaniac
MacRetro Rider
OOOOO more retro than me indeed, thats fighting talk, that is.
Under the definition our bikes are not neccesarily retro, some are just old. So most of my collection losses out to Kaisers as its just old junk. But if Kaiser is more retro that could mean its more pastiche
Either way Chiefy's bikes certainly look way better than mine and I would go as far as say they look better than many on this site such is his attention to detail.
Keep up the good work K and I'll keep grouching, each to his own speciality.
This forum would be no fun without pointless debate
