Defiant":1mxo6suh said:
sinnett177":1mxo6suh said:
Defiant":1mxo6suh said:
okay,..told the seller that i wouldn't do it becuase it isn't the elevated chainstay,..but now he tells me it is (i never asked him before BTW)
he tells me it is has a black fork,..and blue decals,..
Sounds odd the 1991 is the one pictured (previously) and the 1992 is all black with multicoloured decals (shown below).
yes,..he just indentified this picture as the bike it is,..
is this any good? (better then the once previously mentioned)
it has the original XT group in a nice condition,...
The flying welshman is the man to ask i'd say. In his earlier post he seemed to suggest that post 1992 al-mega's should be fine and if anyone knew he'd be the man. I have however seen a few 1992's with cracks between the estay and the BB on ebay.
You may need to take an educated guess on this one. Check to see how much wear it's had, original tyres, rings, BB's etc should be a good sign. I have quite a few pics of original al-mega XT's if you need them.