Aargh! Chainring touching the chainstay!

Anthony":3j6fqd2k said:
We_are_Stevo":3j6fqd2k said:
:LOL: I'd still rather believe the evidence of my own eyes from the middle photo :LOL:
His problem is that he has an untenable 45mm chainline - a CD ring wouldn't make much difference to that, it would still be far too close. If he had a 50mm chainline, there would be no problem.

XTR stayed on standard drive until 2003. According to you, Trek designed a frame that couldn't have XTR fitted to it with a standard chainline?

Agree its a chainline issue, but given its been pointed out previously and people still won't listen to the advice I wouldn't bother telling them again...
 
LOL, The thing to bear in mind here, is that these cranks are renowned for needing a wide bottom bracket, I just wasn't aware *quite* how long! (They also have a large Q factor). I'm reckoning on needing a 132mm!

As it turns out, the front mech would struggle with this chainline, so a longer axle is totally the answer.

And it also turns out that Royce are only a few miles from me, so I'm going to have a chat with them once I've saved a few pennies.
 
Anthony":au38ncxr said:
We_are_Stevo":au38ncxr said:
Anthony":au38ncxr said:
XTR stayed on standard drive until 2003. According to you, Trek designed a frame that couldn't have XTR fitted to it with a standard chainline?
Touche...
http://www.mijnalbum.nl/GroteFoto-AZBHWN7V.jpg
...though those rings aren't far off the stays!
The idea is to say touché when you've just proved yourself right, not when you've just proved yourself wrong.

I know, I was being gracious in defeat... :LOL:
 

Latest posts

Back
Top