ibbz":2ehv1x9g said:
MikeD":2ehv1x9g said:
ibbz":2ehv1x9g said:
Now I've just read these posts and discovered that it was actually the first of the bog standard ordinary XT components.
Not really. XT level has always been XT level. XTR came in above it. It wasn't the case that XT got significantly cheaper or worse (barring certain idiosyncracies as noted above), it's just that Shimano moved the high end upwards.
Conflicting accounts, I heard that XT went sharply lower end with M750,
ref.
http://www.disraeligears.co.uk/
I think you can take it that Mike knows more about these matters than anybody else here! I was going to say a vaguely similar thing actually - it's not about quality going down, as the designs were continually improved over the years. It's two other things really:
a. M739 had some design flaws as I noted above, but they weren't down-grades, they were just mistakes - e.g., the parallelogram V-brake was a sophisticated design, much more expensive to make than its rivals. And when new, it worked very well, it was just that they failed to anticipate the level of play that would develop. The M750 V-brake that superceded it got it right.
b. later groupsets don't look right on retro frames. 1997 was around the last time when frame colour schemes were generally designed for silver bars, stem, post. After that, black took over. So if you take the silver/grey colour of M750 shifters, that's designed for black bars and it's no wonder it doesn't look right on a retro bike with silver bars. Even worse, brake levers with silver bodies and black levers look terrible - they look ok with black bars though, which is what they were designed for.
To me, the point about retro is that it looks right, it works ok and it's top value for money. Modern stuff works better, but its cost is off the scale, so vfm-wise retro wins.