Anthony":agobs1sq said:
I agree with that that, but maturity is a transient state. As in an apple, maturity succeeds immaturity and precedes decay.
To regret change and think modern things are bad is not a sign of discernment. Someone who thinks modern things are bad has reached stage three.
Not necessarily...
It may be that modern things are (in some specific case) objectively bad. It may be that the advantages of modernity are achieved at a cost that we're unwilling to pay, or it may be that the potential advantages of a
future modernity aren't obvious in a disadvantageous
present.
It may be the case that while we recognize that modern tastes aren't
objectively worse than our own
mature ones, they aren't
subjectively our own.
Let me jump back to this, which is about where I came in:
Whether it's clothes, music, bikes, whatever. If you don't like modern things, it's just a sign that you're old.
Let's take music as an example.
The composers and performers of many of my favourite recordings had been dead for decades - centuries in the case of some composers - before those works ever came to my attention. The musical history of our culture stretches back for hundreds of years. When I began to
listen to music (rather than just hear it) and develop my own tastes, my explorations nearly always took me
back into the past - often backwards and forwards in time, from point to point, from genre to genre, from one performer or style to another - but always within the great, deep body of the past, rather than to and fro on the
surface of the present. Sometimes I come to the surface, but it's not where I like to spend very much of my time. My musical tastes develop all the time, but I'm not very much influenced by the onward rush of the
modern. By your definition I was old at fifteen. By mine, I was just starting to show a little maturity.
I don't shun the new because it's new. I recognize that the present is a
surface, and the past is a
volume.