What's so special about Syncros

dbmtb":3ey0ydu3 said:
The Ahead version was a stupid design though, notorious for crimping steerers and rendering them unusable.
The documents that came with my Cattlehead stems say that they should only be used with the Syncros "Wedgelock" expander nut. I wonder if one if its functions was stopping the stem clamp crushing the steerer.

I haven't had any crimping problems with the Cattlehead stems I've used, but I've often wished they'd used a universal flat top cap rather than their own sloping model.

I remember reading a cryptic comment in one of Keith Bontrager's rants a long time ago that if you were looking for a fatigue-resistant stem, you shouldn't buy a Syncros. Again, no problems here.
 
utahdog2003":3bs3yble said:
No offense, but asking this question demonstrates your youth. :D

Too many younger folks don't have a familiarity or an understanding of the quality of the original Canadian Syncros parts. Original Syncros parts were very well made and thought out. At a time when aftermarket parts had begun to earn a bad rep for durability (or lack thereof, i.e. Kooka) Syncros came into the fray and offered great parts and an understated look that said all business. Syncros was never the same after they were purchased in the late 90s by one of the evil empires of the cycling world, and they later folded, only to be reorganized into the bastard junk vendor that currently hocks complete crap. Were it not for the molesting of the Syncros name by the crap components being labeled by the brand today, we retrobikers would be paying an arm and a leg to get our hands on some of the best mountain components ever made. THAT is why folks in the know go ape for the original Syncros parts. For many, there is no other.

Syncros was then what Thomson is today. You meet a guy on the trail today with a Thomson stem or post and you know that he's solved that component question on his build for good, and he's got no reason to defend his purchase up and above just saying, "Hey, it's a Thomson." Back in the early 90s, "Hey, it's Syncros" meant the same thing. Owning either Syncros (or Thomson today) means no justification needed here, thanks...you can keep your red KORE crap post or your flexy Ringle Moby with it's myriad of recalls, or your purple Hershey 'n*ked' hubs or your Nuke Proof garbage. Syncros was all you needed. Hammer and Cycle.

Very few companies to me represent the image of dependable aftermarket components better than Syncros. Race Face, Cook Bros, Syncros, WTB, IRD...none of them dicked around with CNC derailleurs or little floppy brake levers made out of dry spaghetti noodles. They were the real deal.

Hammer and Cycle. :cool:

Couldn't agree more :)
 
ededwards":1if4nm0b said:
Syncros cranks were probably not the most reliable

First generation cranks (with glossy finish) might be the ones you refer to. I just broke a crank a few months ago, but I had 60k miles on them, so I'm not complaining. The second gen, matte finish, were stronger than the first.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top