gtRTSdh":2vo9by5y said:They weren't exactly cheap new and are a design icon in my opinion and look very cool. . . I really want an early one but just have too many bikes already!
NeilM":zj3nyaum said:gtRTSdh":zj3nyaum said:They weren't exactly cheap new and are a design icon in my opinion and look very cool. . . I really want an early one but just have too many bikes already!
The same could be said of many bikes, including my STS-2 or Zaskar, but they are still only worth a couple of hundred quid, probably less than that in the case of the STS.
Like I said, I think the Mantra is still one of the best looking bikes there is, but unlike an art collector, I am not happy to pay a lot of money for something that looks nice, despite the expectations of some sellers.
gtRTSdh":1o2dlkbm said:You just can't compare Kleins and GTs, there were no cheap Kleins and as such in car terms the analogy would be fords and porsches.
amedias":wh62kk1d said:are they actually selling at that price though?
the only ones i've seen actually selling have been the ones priced realistically
NeilM":wmv3wlys said:gtRTSdh":wmv3wlys said:You just can't compare Kleins and GTs, there were no cheap Kleins and as such in car terms the analogy would be fords and porsches.
You misunderstand. What I am saying, is just because it had a price tag when new, does not make it worth money 15 years on. Look at the Porsche Boxtser, they can be had for a couple of grand now, same as an older TVR.
I am not saying that a good clean original Mantra is not worth £400 or even £500 (although a lot better bikes can be had for the same or less money), I am just struck by the recent flurry of Matra's appearing with £500 to £1200 price tags. If that's what they are worth to the owner, fair enough, but to expect that kind of money for a 15 year old suspension bike is, I feel, optimistic to say the least.