gerryattrick
Retrobike Rider
- Feedback
- View
Assuming that the most enjoyable bit about bikes is the riding of them, what else about them gives retrobikers the most satisfaction.
In my case it's definitely the turning of old, usually neglected, bikes into something that I or somebody else can enjoy and use – not necessarily being strictly tied to the original era when it comes to kit/decals etc. There's a lot of satisfaction in looking for bits and pieces to complete a build – preferably at little or no cost.
For me the satisfaction is in almost inverse proportion to the cost of the finished bike. It's certainly not in the ownership, as other than keeping two bikes I enjoy for my own use the others are for getting rid of. My two current users are a 1994 Merlin Malt that cost around £120 in total and a 93 Eldridge Grade that has cost around £90. Once the 92/93 Marin Team Issue is finished (at less than £80) the EG is going to have to go.
I know there are others who spend many hundreds, if not thousands, on their bikes, and I'm not knocking them because they do have some brilliant machines, but it just doesn't do it for me, and possibly they would get little enjoyment out of rebuilding say an old mid-range Claud Butler or Trek.
I don't mean this in any anti “elitist” way as I fully understand there are great bikes and crap bikes, and a huge range in between, and one day I might be lucky enough to get a great bike for next to nothing – but it will have to be for next to nothing!
So what is it about retrobiking that floats your boat?
In my case it's definitely the turning of old, usually neglected, bikes into something that I or somebody else can enjoy and use – not necessarily being strictly tied to the original era when it comes to kit/decals etc. There's a lot of satisfaction in looking for bits and pieces to complete a build – preferably at little or no cost.
For me the satisfaction is in almost inverse proportion to the cost of the finished bike. It's certainly not in the ownership, as other than keeping two bikes I enjoy for my own use the others are for getting rid of. My two current users are a 1994 Merlin Malt that cost around £120 in total and a 93 Eldridge Grade that has cost around £90. Once the 92/93 Marin Team Issue is finished (at less than £80) the EG is going to have to go.
I know there are others who spend many hundreds, if not thousands, on their bikes, and I'm not knocking them because they do have some brilliant machines, but it just doesn't do it for me, and possibly they would get little enjoyment out of rebuilding say an old mid-range Claud Butler or Trek.
I don't mean this in any anti “elitist” way as I fully understand there are great bikes and crap bikes, and a huge range in between, and one day I might be lucky enough to get a great bike for next to nothing – but it will have to be for next to nothing!
So what is it about retrobiking that floats your boat?