bikeworkshop
Senior Retro Guru
At 950 grms they’re the weight of a heavy steel fork
950g might have been the weight of a heavy steel fork in 1995.
Now it's 1.5kg! Surly is close!
At 950 grms they’re the weight of a heavy steel fork
Personally I think Ti forks are a more worthwhile upgrade than a Ti frame.
A compliant steel frame with decent Ti forks gives a sweet, light and supple ride that doesn’t seem to be available today
I think one of the later Flite Evos might have had hollow Ti rails.. but no doubt some one will be able to confirm or correct..A steel tube should be superior to a ti rod in weight and flex.
Did anyone make a saddle with tubular ti?
Absolutely….I'm a marketers dream with titanium!!!Funny you should mention that… I picked up a complete bike earlier this year with a similar steel railed Vector and instantly whipped it off for a Ti tailed Bontrager.. but as I (scientifically) weighed them both up in my hands.. they felt pretty much the same - which was confirmed by the scales. I think the Ritchey saddle in question has hollow rails, which goes some way to explaining it…
However… to complete the explanation, I think you need to reflect on how heavily marketed titanium was as an elite material for “Team” riders and other such badasses back in the ‘90s - and how heavily we all bought into that. The titanium premium was probably more to do with this marketing (and therefore manufacturer margin), than all the supposed real world space-age lightness hoo ha.
That said. I frickin’ love titanium.
I think that's true.I think one of the later Flite Evos might have had hollow Ti rails.. but no doubt some one will be able to confirm or correct..