- Feedback
- View
...
legrandefromage":1xoarn9t said:Ok. Dont know where this stems from. I've never even commented on any of bushpigs or any other us built bikes. So why i'm suddenly singled out is beyond me. If you'd actually bothered to read the first post you would have 'learnt' a bit about the early mtb scene in the UK. Instead you chose the route of the moron and in doing so giving your future comments/ projects/ finds even less credibility.
legrandefromage":35smscn9 said:I was bestowed that banner by the site owner. Its still not an excuse just to be plain rude and ignorant or is that how you enjoy being perceived? Theres opinions then there personal unwarranted attacks.
legrandefromage":u204ju9q said:which you have now confirmed.The only way the read the above, authored by you, is that I *am* an asshole. It is ad hominem.
jonnyboy666":15xvc137 said:"Just trying to add some diversity of opinion. The fawning was a bit much given the bikes. Objectively, maybe the Overbury is ok, for what its worth, but overall, meh. Nothing wrong with meh either, but I don't see the point of jizzing in my pants over meh."
diversity of opinion? no you didn't, you just insulted his bikes.
fawning? LGF showed a picture of his stuff and said compare the BB heights, others "fawned" not him.
meh? if you think "meh" then why comment? on all forums of all subjects there are good and bad examples of that subject. Quite often i think "meh . . . whatever" but if i don't like something i don't post, i think most people do the same. if you had something polite to say or something about LGF's original BB height related statement then fine and welcome but you didn't.
jizzing your pants? may i direct you to the "eye candy thread" or perhaps suggest you find a left handed website.
legrandefromage":yw3hbltw said:I was bestowed that banner by the site owner. Its still not an excuse just to be plain rude and ignorant or is that how you enjoy being perceived? Theres opinions then there personal unwarranted attacks.