The recent spat of inter forum banter got me thinking about the differences between the three big retro forums (don't think I'm being presumptuous counting retrobike in this number ). Ultimately we're all into the same things - old bikes basically.
Each forum and user base seems to have it own 'style' almost. Retrobike users tend to favour early 90s stuff spandangled with anodized trick bits (as personified by Jezza). MTBR VRC has some of the sweetest restoration jobs ever but generally favours slightly older rides (maybe reflecting the sport taking off sooner in the US) done out more or less as original. Mtb-news classic seems again to favour early 90s stuff, this time done out immaculately with all period correct and functional parts.
Off course these are sweeping generalisation and just my perception. Maybe I'm talking crap. What are your thoughts?
Each forum and user base seems to have it own 'style' almost. Retrobike users tend to favour early 90s stuff spandangled with anodized trick bits (as personified by Jezza). MTBR VRC has some of the sweetest restoration jobs ever but generally favours slightly older rides (maybe reflecting the sport taking off sooner in the US) done out more or less as original. Mtb-news classic seems again to favour early 90s stuff, this time done out immaculately with all period correct and functional parts.
Off course these are sweeping generalisation and just my perception. Maybe I'm talking crap. What are your thoughts?